For decades, the Environmental Protection Agency has calculated the health benefit costs associated with reducing air ...

A new rule by the EPA to no longer consider the economic cost of human health from two major air pollutants in its ...

The first year of President Trump’s second term has seen an aggressive rollback of federal environmental protections, which advocacy groups fear will bring more pollution, higher health risks, and ...

The EPA won't consider the economic costs of harms to human health, at least for now. Legal and health experts are concerned ...

Environmentalists in West Virginia are speaking out after an appropriations bill passed the U.S. Senate on Friday that strips ...

The EPA plans to stop considering health benefits when setting air pollution rules, specifically from curbing pollutants.

Experts fear consequences will include health complications, stalled industry, a society further disconnected from science ...

The change means the EPA will focus rules for two pollutants only on the cost to industry, part of a realignment under ...

A recent study from Oregon Health and Science University found common air pollutants can alter adolescent brain development.

Pharmaceuticals used in health care provide huge health and economic benefits to society, but are now found extensively as ...

The world's leading cardiovascular societies, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the American College of Cardiology ...