I guess this is a real thing? https://www.neowin.net/news/intel-w...sed-64-bit-only-cpu-architecture-called-x86s/ I guess so... here's the white paper on Intel's site ...

Would you believe that you can take a relatively-modern Intel or AMD computer and install regular old MS-DOS on it? Well, you can (depending somewhat on the machine). Doing so will utterly waste the ...

The next generation of Intel Corp. Itanium 2 processors will get an upgrade meant to improve the performance 32-bit enterprise applications running on Itanium-based systems. The new 64-bit chip will ...

If you have never heard of the Bellmac-32, you aren’t alone. But it is a good bet that most, if not all, of the CPUs in your devices today use technology pioneered by this early 32-bit CPU. The chip ...

At the time that the iAPX 432 (originally the 8800) project was proposed, Gordon Moore was CEO of Intel, and thus ultimately signed off on it. Intended as an indirect successor to the successful 8080 ...

Most people would probably agree that Intel is in need of a win in the CPU sector, now that AMD's Ryzen 5000 series is kicking tail and taking names (for those who can find one in stock, anyway). Ice ...

80386DX I believe. I know the 486 was 32 bit. The 386DX comes to mind because it's the lowest piece of junk that can run Windows 95, which requires 32 bit mode.

The chipmaker has a long track record of downplaying interest in chips that could read both 32-bit and 64-bit software. Still, over the last decade, it was tinkering away. Michael Kanellos is editor ...